Galt Global Review

QFS 360

February 11, 2003

IT training today: trends and paradoxes

by Tatiana Andronache, I.S.P.
While IT professionals are constantly reminded that upgrading their skills is paramount to being and remaining an IT worker - especially in this ultra competitive IT market, training has surely become the Cinderella of IT corporate budgets. How can the IT worker make sense out of this and what's really the consequence for organizations? How does the training equation add up?

In the current economic climate, many organizations must cut costs and find new strategies to stay alive; costs associated with information technology are not an exception and IT training is more often seen as an expense rather than an investment.

Traditional training
Classroom training led by an instructor is the traditional form of training. It is an expensive form of training and the return on investment (ROI) for companies is not always apparent (some studies show that only 8-12 per cent of attendees can trace measurable performance improvements to having attended these classes).

Sometimes the ROI is not there because of poor project planning. For example, a company decided to rewrite a mission-critical system and told their developers that they have to retrain in Java or six months down the road their jobs will be gone - the company even paid for the training at a local college - but as soon as the fresh Java converts returned to their desks, the project was shelved due to performance problems.

The buddy system
The buddy system is a tried-and-true approach to training. Often, because many tasks require only a minimal subset of a tool's capability, it is possible to get by (at least for a while) with picking up a minimal set of survival skills from an internal expert on a language or package. A new twist to this is the Internet. Thanks to the availability of a wealth of information, forums and experts, some project managers feel that a new language can be learned by most staff, on very short notice, with only a few Internet links given to them. The employee's time then becomes the whole cost for this training.

E-learning is a more respectable option, and an attractive one because of its flexibility and multitude of flavours (desk-top based, intranet based, distance learning via internet - to name just a few), but it is not necessarily cheap or more effective.

Mentoring
Mentoring appears to be the new darling of many companies on the lookout for new, inexpensive and effective ways to train their IT staff. This can certainly be attributed to its minimal cost, and to the fact that very specific knowledge can be passed on to the mentored. Knowledge that is not strictly technical, but also business related. Having a basic understanding of business is becoming more and more a desirable asset for IT technical staff, yet the training options are far less than for purely technical skills. Many times, skills that are essential to operating a business are niche skills and mentoring offers an opportunity to share experience as well as knowledge.

Doing it yourself
Another trend in IT training is to place the responsibility squarely on the shoulders (and purse) of the employee under the guise of career empowerment. This approach may work for freelancers, but it is difficult to measure how well it enables the alignment of the interests and efforts of employees with those of the company.

And now what?
Although measuring the benefits of training is still more of an art than a science, the cost of not training is the real challenge. For example, how much time and productivity is lost because employees, not having been formally trained, do not understand the full capabilities of a utility, or simply do not use or choose the right tools for the job?

Not planning time for training and review on how one is performing the tasks, or not fostering a culture where people are encouraged to challenge themselves and their peers in order to find or share ways of improving their performance, in fact carries a high price tag. Even the most sophisticated training method can't make up for pitfalls in planning and timing or for poor integration between the IT training and the company's overall strategy. But on the other hand, simple strategic methods can go a long way towards improving employee and corporate performance. Carefully planned synergy between what IT professionals on one hand, and employers on the other, want and need in terms of training - will go a long way to improve the company's overall performance.

Tatiana Andronache is IT technical staff for a large information technology company in Toronto, Canada. She can be reached at tatiana.andronache@sympatico.ca

Do you have a comment or feedback on this article? Email us and let us know what you think.


Do you have a comment or feedback on this article? Email us and let us know what you think.

 Business News / Business Roundup - Australia / Canada / Europe / United States / Careers / Classified / Information Technology / New Technology / Education News / World Facts / Book Reviews / Archives/Research