Galt Global Review

QFS 360

July 6, 2004
Certifications in IT: shooting for the Moon?
by Tatiana Andronache, I.S.P.


While trying to avoid the “hot/not” rhyme, the goal of this article really is to explain why, in the current depressed IT climate, some certifications are (still) hot, and some are not. I am not sure how good the explanation is going to be, but the new metaphor in the title is not without merit.

Certification and Experience
Everyone knows that the light we get from the Moon is not the real thing; it is just a reflection of Sun’s light. And yet the Moon continues to be the object of so much praise and admiration. Going to the Moon is certainly no small exploit, although not much awaits the valiant entrepreneur upon return.

Certification in IT is not much different: most professionals will confirm that in today’s market, having a certification acronym after your name is no guarantee of a promotion, let alone a job. Nevertheless, it is a mark of professional respectability that one cannot afford to ignore without incurring significant career risk.

While most IT employers want to hire someone with experience, experience is not certifiable. As a professional, claim 20 years of experience in an IT specialty and you may date yourself out of employability; claim less than two years, and you get the same result. But certification establishes a common ground, where both parties would gladly go. The prospective employer gets the assurance that the candidate has at least been scrutinized through an external, standardized process and demonstrated he possesses the required knowledge - should the new hire not succeed in the new position, the hiring party is somewhat less to blame. The candidate has a chance at a level play field. Having passed a certification exam he has enhanced his credibility and sense of value – and, depending on the particular market, his salary prospects.

The quest for certification in IT
Some fifteen years ago (an astronomical number of years in IT!) certification for the IT worker was a non-issue. Programs were written, systems were built and there is no evidence that they ran any worse than systems built today by the largely certified pool of IT professionals. So, is there a real need for certification in IT?

Certification in IT was certainly driven by the big IT firms. Novell pioneered the concept and was quickly followed by all major international players. As operations of these firms became more and more globalized, and as the work force in IT became more international and diverse, vendor certifications grew in number and depth of specialization. Today there are over 100 of them worth pursuing (any respectable certification program is based, according to some sources, on a body of at least 10,000 practitioners). Some companies saw the certification movement as a golden opportunity to advance their marketing strategy and to expand their base of users. Also, new (and profitable!) companies were established with the mere purpose of marketing, managing and administering IT certifications. This led some skeptics in the industry to see certifications as a money-grab more than anything else.

IT Certification today: moonrise
Today, IT certification is an industry in itself, although certifications are still deeply connected with a specific programming language, development platform or IT product. The fortunes of these certifications come and go with those of the respective languages, platforms and products. Notably, the MCSE and MCSA certifications from Microsoft have become a commodity, to the point that the number of people seeking them has declined to levels that put some certification businesses in a very precarious position. At the same time, demand for Linux certification continues to be surprisingly strong, when considering the overall depressed certification market and meager IT training budgets. Some analysts think that the grass-root culture of Linux explains the trend.

There are very few non-vendor IT certifications but their number and degree of attraction to the IT professionals is expected to grow. As the IT work force is becoming more self-reliant, portable skills will be favoured over vendor-based ones, because the latter have a high rate of becoming obsolete. Developing and certifying competency in project management and software engineering disciplines will likely become a priority for the serious IT professional. Already, the PMP certification has acquired a well-recognized international status. In Canada, the I.S.P., a non-vendor certification emphasizing professional conduct and adherence to a code of ethics is put forward, with limited success so far, by CIPS (Canadian Information Processing Society).

As long as IT budgets stagnate or shrink and training is downloaded at individual level, the popularity of IT certifications will probably be driven by the perceptions and needs of the individual practitioners, rather then corporate strategies. As the IT profession matures and globalizes, certifications will become more important but will never be a substitute for or a guarantee of competence, experience, and strong business ethics. After all, the Moon does not shine all on its own.

 


Do you have a comment or feedback on this article? Email us and let us know what you think.