Galt Global Review

QFS 360

      
May 12, 2004
information technology
Business continuity moves front stage center
By Samuel Greengard

Warranted concerns  |  Playing it safe

In a post 9/11-world, security and business continuity have become the top two spending priorities for IT executives. Although each organization must develop its own blueprint for business continuity, certain core components exist.

Warranted concerns
Today's business environment is radically different from only a decade ago. The lingering effects of 9/11, increased threats from hackers and the risk of disruption due to everything from power failures to computer viruses, has many business leaders deeply concerned. In fact, security and business continuity have emerged as the top two spending priorities among IT executives for 2004, according to Framingham, Mass.-based market research firm IDC.

The concern is certainly warranted. Any disruption in services can undermine operations and put valuable data at risk. But it might also result in financial losses, damage to a firm's reputation, and regulatory and legal sanctions. Last fall's blackout of the northeastern United States illustrated how serious an issue business continuity is.

What's more, the affect of a disruption can be far-reaching. A bank that cannot dispense money from ATMs or an insurance company that cannot tap into its customer records represents a serious threat to public well being. Today, it's essential to have technology and processes in place to manage unforeseen circumstances.

As a result, IDC forecasts that spending on security and business continuity could reach $116 billion by 2007. That's twice the rate of overall IT spending over the same period. Organizations that do not prepare adequately are at great risk.

A 2002 study by the Stamford, Conn.-based IT research firm Meta Group found that 30 per cent of businesses suffering a catastrophic event, brought on by a prolonged power outage, flood, fire, tornado or earthquake, never reopen their doors; and an additional 29 per cent see the business fail within 2 years. Often, the greatest losses aren't the result of the immediate disaster, but ongoing lapses during the recovery phase. Organizations first lose critical files or information...and loyal customers follow.

Playing it safe
In some industries, such as financial services, business continuity is now under intense scrutiny. Last April, for example, the Federal Reserve, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) jointly issued an inter-agency paper on Sound Practices to Strengthen the Resilience of the U.S. Financial System.

The joint commission identified three core business continuity objectives: rapid recovery and timely resumption of critical operations following a wide-scale disruption; rapid recovery and timely resumption of critical operations following the loss or inaccessibility of staff in at least one major operating location; and a high level of confidence, through ongoing use or robust testing, that critical internal and external continuity arrangements are effective and compatible.

To be sure, business continuity and contingency planning are complex endeavors, involving detailed analysis and preparation. While many organizations do not demand the safeguards required by banks, brokerage firms and insurance companies, laxity can spell disaster. During last summer's blackout of the northeast U.S., one-quarter of the businesses surveyed (24 per cent) lost more than $50,000 per hour due to downtime, and 4 percent of businesses lost more than $1 million for each hour of downtime, according to Strongsville, Ohio-based business technology consulting firm Mirifex.

Reproduced with permission © 2003 Samuel Greengard. To enquire, please email sam@greengard.com