Galt Global Review

QFS 360

January 4, 2006
Can Wikipedia Be Trusted?

Infotech Feature

by Matthew Davis


According to John Seigenthaler, journalist, civil rights activist and former assistant to Attorney General Robert Kennedy, Wikipedia is a groundbreaking online encyclopedia that is "populated by volunteer vandals with poison-pen intellects."

Founded in 2001, Wikipedia boasts a database of over 3.7 million articles and is ranked the 37th most visited website. A huge free source for information, Wikipedia is composed of articles written and freely edited by users. The text on the site includes extensive hyperlinks which gives readers exposure to related articles, while also providing external links, pictures and video. There is also a discussion tab, which allows readers to view discussions and arguments posted by users about the topic.

However, although being found to have the accuracy comparable to Encyclopedia Britannica by the journal Nature, Wikipedia has recently been under fire by critics for publishing false information, most notably, an article accusing famed journalist John Seigenthaler as an accomplice in the Kennedy murders, as well as an article denouncing Simon Wiesenthal (on the day following his death), a holocaust survivor who helped track down more than 1000 Nazi war criminals, as a homosexual sex addict. Additionally, after the death of the Pope, an anonymous user replaced the image of incoming Pope Benedict XVI with the evil emperor from Star Wars.

In response to recent scandals, co-founder of Wikipedia, Jimmy Wales, offered his response: "Such pranks are a little disappointing, but given how insane the whole idea is in the first place - that you could let anybody edit any page - it's a miracle that so little vandalism goes on."

Wales, at the risk of sounding callous, may have a point. With the amount of information posted by volunteers and edited by the public, it is amazing that there are only a handful of articles written/edited with intent to sabotage. Although Wikipedia's articles are checked by Wikipedia's staff of editors and can be flagged by users for false information, with the extensive amount of information posted, it is impossible to catch fallacies immediately after posting. According to Wales, Wikipedia is currently perfecting a new device which will serve as a more proficient accuracy tester.

 

Do you have a comment or feedback on this article? Email us and let us know what you think.