Galt Global Review

QFS 360

September 23, 2003
Learning in Reverse: Part 1 of 2
by Samuel Greengard


For the CEO of a multi-million dollar company, being “cool” typically ranks dead last on a list of priorities. But for Sander A. Flaum, who heads Euro RSCG Life, a 1,000-person marketing and healthcare advertising firm headquartered in New York City, it’s essential to connect to the whims, passions and predilections of young consumers. Without understanding the nuances of the marketplace, Flaum could stumble and the business could tumble

A role reversal
Flaum, who has headed the agency for the last 15 years and has 38 years of experience in advertising, isn’t one to whither from a challenge. And, at this point, he’s also not afraid to check his ego at the door. “I don’t spend a lot of time browsing Web sites, I don’t watch Survivor and I don’t know the hottest, hippest restaurants,” he admits. “But it is important that I understand what account reps and designers are talking about and have some idea what makes a campaign work. ”

The solution? Flaum has joined a growing cadre of executives that rely on reverse mentoring to keep them informed about everything from technology to social trends. While traditional mentoring focuses on passing knowledge from experienced professionals to up-and-coming stars, reverse mentoring feeds expertise up the corporate hierarchy. “The sharing of knowledge doesn’t have to be a one-way street. A younger or less experienced worker can help an older or more senior employee gain insight into key areas, such as computers and technology, culture and highly focused technical areas,” says Linda Phillips-Jones, principal consultant at The Mentoring Group, Grass Valley, California.

This role reversal can provide bottom line benefits on the front lines of business. “Reverse mentoring can improve decision making, reduce training costs and create an organization that is more tightly knit,” explains Matt M. Starcevich, CEO of the Center for Coaching and Mentoring in Bartlesville Okalahoma. When his organization studied the trend in 2001 it found that 41 per cent of respondents now use reverse mentoring to spread technical expertise and 26 per cent to help executives gain a younger perspective.

Turning the tables
Of course, young people have always helped their parents and grandparents brush up on pop culture or how to use the latest technology gizmo. And brash, young workers have always felt they know more than management—at least when it comes to their job. But reverse mentoring ratchets up the concept a notch or two. In recent years, a slew of companies have recognized its value and established reverse mentoring programs. The list includes General Electric, Proctor & Gamble, Philip Morris, Best Buy, Siemens and Chase Manhattan Bank. In addition, the Seattle Public Schools and the Wharton School of Business at the University of Pennsylvania and have shifted the knowledge flow into reverse.

Most observers credit former General Electric CEO Jack Welch as the catalyst for this burgeoning movement. Although the roots of corporate reverse mentoring extend back to the early 1990s, it wasn’t until the end of the decade that the high-profile chief executive ordered 500 of his top managers to find workers who could teach them the finer points of Web browsing and researching online. Welch himself choose a mentor and blocked off time to learn about everything from browser bookmarks to competitors’ Web sites. Prior to that, Welch had rarely surfed the Web and found himself overwhelmed by the experience.

Not long afterwards, Procter & Gamble CIO Steve David—a 30-plus year veteran of the company and a longtime mentoring advocate—opted to turn the tables. He began a reverse mentoring relationship with a staff scientist so that he could learn more about how science and toxicology affect business decisions. The pair met every month or two in an office or over lunch to discuss topics ranging from the structure of DNA to sophisticated biotechnology issues.

The following organizations have made reverse mentoring a success

General Electric: In 1999, former chief executive officer Jack Welch established a reverse mentoring program for himself and other top executives. About once a month, Welch met with the 37-year-old manager of GE’s corporate Web site, who helped him learn how to surf the Web and conduct basic research online. GE Plastics and other divisions of the U.S. $130 billion (2002 sales) firm also have established reverse mentoring programs.

Proctor & Gamble: A pioneer in reverse mentoring, P&G established its first program in the early 1990s. Then, the advertising division was losing twice as many women as men. After the launch of a reverse mentoring program designed to address challenges facing women, the hemorrhaging slowed. By 2000, the concept had hit the radar screens of top execs, including CIO Steve David.

RSCG Life: The 1,000 employee advertising agency, the largest catering to the pharmaceutical industry, turned to reverse mentoring over a year ago. More than 30 senior executives participate in the program. They learn about technology, pop culture, and trendy restaurants so that they can relate to younger clients and boost their computer skills. The program isn’t designed to serve as a philosophical make-over, but a way for execs to bridge the generation gap.

Seattle Public Schools: During the summer of 2002, female students in the Seattle Public Schools, a district with nearly 47,000 students, spent the summer educating teachers about computers and technology. The goal of the program, dubbed Generation www.Y, was to integrate technology into the classroom and improve student learning. The students designed the curriculum, rules and lesson plans and collaborated with teachers at South Seattle Community College.

Wharton School of Business: The University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton Fellows Business program matches some of the top executives in the nation to MBA candidates and undergrads, who help them gain knowledge in technology and business through reverse mentoring. At present, about 100 fellows participate in reverse mentoring. The program has received positive feedback and continued to grow.

<< top >>

Learning in reverse: Part 2 of 2 release date - October 21, 2003

Reproduced with permission © 2003 Samuel Greengard. To enquire, please email sam@greengard.com