Galt Global Review

QFS 360

 
March 16, 2005

Teaching Ethics

by Michael Alleyne


Ethics: (Greek ethika, from ethos, "character," "custom"), principles or standards of human conduct, sometimes called morals (Latin mores, "customs").

The basic problems of philosophy continue to be the same even as the advent of new technologies and the advancement of science have led us to more complex perspectives on old problems. The branch of ethics is no different.

"Eudaimonia", or a state of happiness, contentedness and prosperousness combined, was thought of by the ancient Greeks as one of the highest ideals of ethics. Skip forward to thousands of years later and we find that our conception of what the "common good" is still continues to baffle us. The individual need for free will has gradually replaced family or community needs, bringing with it an entirely new set of ethical issues.

With the arrival of increasingly powerful technologies and advancements in the understanding of medicine, genetics, nanotechnology and other branches of science, our society seems to be demanding for an equal increase in ethical behaviour and wisdom to balance out our potentially serious blindness to future difficulties.

How we teach ethics becomes even more important as we are required to make more complex decisions concerning consumer, environmental, business and political issues during this unprecedented time in our history.


Ethical Development

Laurence Kohlberg, a professor at Harvard University in the 1970's, suggested that individuals pass through three sequential stages of ethical development: The pre-conventional stage, the conventional stage and the post-conventional stage.

The pre-conventional stage is found in most preschools and dog-training facilities. This is the stage where individuals learn to behave according to a fixed set of norms taught to them by an authority figure. Usually the Pavlovian method is used to reinforce the proper behaviours and to discourage inappropriate behaviours (i.e. rewards and punishments) until eventually the individual learns that to behave morally is to act in one's better interest.

The conventional stage is the level most adolescents reach. At this point right and wrong are based on group loyalties to family, friends and one's society. It then may advance to recognition of the necessity of law, duty and respect for authority.

The post-conventional stage is the development of the understanding of mutuality and a genuine interest in the welfare of others. This stage is characterized first by a general interest in what makes a good society function, and then develops into an acceptance of certain rights and morals that take priority over the laws of a society.

Kohlberg believed that individuals could not skip any of these levels, and that people can get stuck in one of the earlier stages if specific understanding is never achieved. He also believed that the bulk of moral development is the result of social interaction.

Teaching Ethics

As time has gone on it is apparent that our educational goals have left philosophical and ethical ideals behind.

For the last 50 years or so, school curriculums have gone from complete avoidance of ethical education to incorporating three somewhat consecutive approaches:

  • Values clarification and self-esteem building techniques that clarify an individual's ethical perspective. This is done in attempt to avoid indoctrination of specific values and to encourage students to know what their own belief system is - and why they believe it.
  • Moral decision making that focuses on the education of general ethical principles in the hope that the individual may be able to synthesize the principles on their own.
  • And, more recently, character education, which sees that character has more to do with the formation of individual habits then specific decisions do. The development of positive role models is the most important asset in helping the individual develop a relationship with the people in the society they belong to.

All three of the above approaches have weaknesses, but it would seem as if a program which synthesizes the most useful aspects of all three still needs to be researched.

Character Education

The character education approach seems to work best as it develops the individual's interaction with other individuals in the society. Through these social interactions, the development of habits learned by positive role models can be encouraged. Everyone who comes into contact with students as they advance is responsible. In this way the expectations on both citizens and leaders is increased exponentially as we all learn to pick up the necessary slack in the education of societal values.

<< top >