Galt Global Review

QFS 360

August 26, 2003
Matters of Choice: The advent of parent driven education
by Jana Ritter


Education has always played a primary role in human development and it is generally understood that parents are responsible for their children's education. Yet, amongst a variety of roles ranging from the minor act of meeting a teacher or signing a report card to major fundraising efforts and investments in private schools, parents were always considered secondary to the educational system. Recent public efforts, however, have resulted in more diverse curriculums that meet the various learning requirements of children from different special needs groups, as well as facilitate parental involvement in curriculum development. Now, parents have more than just a marginal role in their children’s schools - they are running them.

Whether it is a difficult student or the school lacking the resources to effectively deal with a difficult situation, one standard educational system is not designed to meet the needs of every child in every community.

Freedom of choice
Choice and equality in education has become a worldwide strategy for school reform. While choice is well established in the UK public school system, the British government still responded to equity issues by basing the admissions processes on academic ability alone. However, the US’s “No Child Left Behind Act” turned choice into a civil rights issue and was introduced along side the Clinton administration’s funding incentives for state charter schools.

Alberta was the first Canadian province to implement similar innovation in education policies and since then, school boards across the country have been responding to public pressure for schools and curriculums of choice. But similar to Australia’s cautious response, Canada has been less certain about how these new policies will benefit Canadian students.

The study of charters
A new concept in public education, charter schools are parent driven independent education centers with the freedom to implement alternative structures and teaching models. In exchange for autonomy, they must be able to demonstrate enhanced or different education delivery systems and prove that they increase the learning abilities of their student body.

Often, these schools accommodate special needs children and, as is the case in Alberta, designated special education schools are eligible to receive full funding. In addition to special needs children, charter schools come in a full range of choices to meet almost any specialized learning requirement. Not only can the gifted, artistic, multilingual, religious and athletic student get their needs met, all girls schools (such as Alberta’s Nellie McClung) cater to the issues of adolescent females and a public high school for homosexuals will soon be opening in New York City.

Choosing sides
The Society for Advancement of Excellence in Education, an independent research group in British Columbia, conducted a three year study and found that Canadian charter school students outperformed their peers by sixty per cent on standard exams, doing better than other students in their region. However, success is the US is somewhat harder to measure.

According to the results of a recent UCLA study of seventeen charter schools in ten California school districts, the reform movement does not look so promising. Among its findings, the study concluded that California’s chartered schools are not yet held accountable to the enhanced academic achievement of their students.

And while the American Teachers Federation released a similar report claiming that US charter schools were not living up to their promises, Jeanne Allen, (president of the Center for Education Reform) thinks otherwise. Referring to the results of their eight-year study of over four hundred charter schools, she reports that although ten per cent had shut down, over eighty per cent remained successful.

“Charter schools have had a measurably positive impact on the health of traditional public schools and have often shown enormous achievement among even some of the nation's poorest children”, claims Allen.

While advocates continue to provide evidence of their success, opposition groups are pointing out the results of their own data and the debate has yet to be resolved. In any case, what started as parental concern over their children’s education has now evolved into a pro-active movement of education delivery reform, and as we can continue to develop policies that verify accountability and promote academic achievement in charter schools, then perhaps we have really learned something about learning.
<< top >>