Galt Global Review

QFS 360

 
January 18, 2006

Brain Science

byFaye Mallett


If ways of understanding reality are similar to all human beings, it is because all of us have the same biological design for interpreting experience: the human brain.

“Brain science” - a combination of neuroscience, cognitive science and psychology – is a rapidly evolving area of study. Like the new computer you bought two years ago that is now obsolete, new evidence will often refute or modify past studies. There is also the added confusion of the media taking hold of a claim in its infant stage and exaggerating or distorting the original scientific evidence. The “Mozart Effect” is one such example, as well as the “use it or lose it” debate popularized in the previous decade.

Those on the “use it or lose it” side of this debate argued that a narrow window of opportunity exists from ages zero to three, the most important period in brain development in a person’s life. While it is true that infant’s brains experience dramatic growth at this time, the main assumption of this myth is that once the window closes parents and teachers have little else to work with. By the time children attend kindergarten, it’s too late, especially in the realm of mental, musical and artistic development. As Hillary Rodham Clinton said at the 1997 White House Conference on Early Childhood Development and Learning, this emphasis on the brain does ''ratchet up the guilt.''

According to Dr. John Bruer author of The Myth of the First Three Years—A New Understanding of Early Brain Development and Lifelong Learning, the assumptions of this debate do have basis in real science.

The brain does produce a higher number of synapses (learning pathways connecting regions of the brain) during the first 3 years of a child’s life, yet our brains continue to produce brain cells – which affect our capacity to learn new skills - throughout our entire lives. So the good news is that if we weren’t exposed to Mozart or were not enrolled in expensive “enriched” preschools before all of our synapses stopped firing around the age of 3, we are still equipped to learn for the rest of our lives. Our brains are not, as Rob Reiner, the Hollywood director and creator of the "I Am Your Child" campaign proclaimed, "cooked" by the time we are 10.

Evidence in neuroscience supports the position that while we have a greater amount of flexibility as infants, it is because the nervous system is “pruning” itself (many of the millions of synapses created as babies are “pruned away” by the time we reach puberty) and development at this stage is occurring at a great pitch . What occurs to our brains as we become adults is a refinement of this process. While we may lack flexibility as we grow older, we do gain the efficiency of implementing what we know. In fact, an exciting discovery in neuroscience is that brain structure is continually affected by experience.
''Our brains remain remarkably plastic and we retain the ability to learn throughout our lives,” Bruer writes.
Brain science – or brain-based learning - as an education theory has become a cottage industry replete with consultants, “brain science certification” courses and products that parents and educators can buy. As a new field, brain-based learning is composed of a mixture of basic results from cognitive science, experimental psychology and, at times, rather ill-informed brain science.

According to Bruer, many consultants are putting together what they know about the brain with what they learned at education graduate school into a “kind of plausible” story told to teachers. Yet he does not rule out the possibility of brain-based education being incorporated into an educational curriculum – in the future. A few decades from now, for example, brain science may be able to give us insights into individual learning styles, with the possibility of having many different educational models.

Evidence consistently reveals how each brain is unique, and that individuals asked to perform the same task may be using mental calculations and different brain circuits to arrive at the same solution. This is where education can aid the individual learning process, by deciphering what kind of learning styles are difficult for some and more natural for others, keeping in mind that some stress is useful in brain development and it is necessary to integrate different learning styles in our education.

Cognitive science and psychology consistently inform us that, regardless of individual preference or aptitude, many different kinds of learning experiences are necessary. Learning numbers, facts and foreign words, for example, are learnt best through drill practice and repetition. Problem-solving abilities are increased through experiential learning. Confucius’ famous dictum states it best: "Tell me, and I will forget. Show me, and I may remember. Involve me, and I will understand."

Eric Jensen, a former high school English teacher, is the author of Teaching with the Brain in Mind and Arts with the Brain in Mind. He is also the co-founder of Jensen Learning Corporation, an organization that trains professionals (Jensen works extensively with Fortune 500 companies) and educators in brain-based learning techniques.

Jensen defines brain-based education as a multi-disciplinary approach based on what we currently know about how our brain learns. Yet in his essay, Brain-Based Learning, Truth or Deception?, Jensen points out that brain research “proves” nothing.

“There is no body of brain-based research that justifies every strategy of so-called "good teaching," he writes. “In fact, most of what passes for good teaching is a collection of folk wisdom, basic psychology and common sense refined by trial and error. However, new findings can steer all of us in more productive directions.”

Jensen attends conferences as a member of the Society for Neuroscience, visits laboratories and interviews scientists extensively to find out what they are discovering in the field. He's finding that many recent discoveries in brain science that have practical classroom applications. They include findings supporting evidence that:
• The human brain can and does grow new cells
• Hormones can and do impact cognition
• Movement influences learning, as does music and art
• The brain can rewire changes
• Space, relational learning and recall learning are effective
• The brain learns things at crucial times in its development
• Time plays an important role in the learning process.
• Nutrition plays an important role in learning and memory
• Chemicals have specific functions and activating the right ones is crucial to the learning process.

As Jensen concludes, these discoveries are cross-disciplinary. “Critics who worry over where the research comes from are missing the point,” he writes. “When you synthesize it with other fields like sociology, chemistry, future studies, anthropology, therapy and others, you can get some powerful applications.”

For more information:
http://www.jlcbrain.com/what.html
http://www.jsmf.org/about/jbio.htm

 

<< top >