Galt Global Review

QFS 360

 
January 6, 2004
Coping with Type I Change
by Peter de Jager



Type I – Change which is done to us.
Type II – Change which we do to ourselves.
Type III – Change which we do to others.

Fundamental challenges
While there are several questions we might ask when a Change is presented to us, there one which trumps all others. Do we have any control over this Change? While this seems to call for simple a "Yes" or "No", if we look a bit deeper, things get complicated. The question is about what we believe, and how that belief matches reality.

 
In reality, we have no control
In reality, we have control
We believe we have no control
Type I.a Normal Grief Cycle... and we work through it.
Healthy

Type I.b Normal Grief Cycle... and we work through it.
Healthy but... we can miss opportunities, some minor, some huge.

We believe we have control

Type I.c Very frustrating - unrealistic – doomed to failure.
Unhealthy

Type I.d Empowering – Life affirming – stimulates growth – the stuff of heroes.
Very Healthy

It would be incredibly naïve to suggest it is an easy task to identify the right cell to inhabit even in this simplistic 2x2 diagram. Properly aligning our beliefs with reality is either a result of deep wisdom... or uncanny luck... and often a mixture of both.

There aren't too many events over which we have no control. Death is the only one that comes to mind. (Taxes are avoidable to some degree!) Sooner or later, we have to recognize the reality of Death and cope with it. The sooner we accept there is nothing we can do to bring back a loved one, the sooner we can put it behind us, and move forward with our lives. This is a clear example of a healthy Type I.a Change.

Other examples of Type I Change are more open to discussion. If we're laid off because of a merger, a downturn in business, bankruptcy, or are fired with or without cause etc. etc., then it becomes more difficult to decide how much control we really have. The question "Is there something I can do about this?" is a persistent one, often with no clear answer.

Finding ourselves in Type I.b is not necessarily the end of the world. Believing we have no control, even if we could do something to affect our course, is the path of least resistance. The question we must ask ourselves is, "Are we content to let others make decisions for us?" The answer is inextricably tied to another question; "Can we trust them to make decisions in our best interest?" If the answer is yes, then accepting Type I.b isn't too uncomfortable... If the answer is no, then we might want to drop down into Type I.d.

Type I.c Change is our most unhealthy of choices. The phrase, "Tilting at windmills" comes to mind. To believe we can seize control of a situation distinctly out of our control can be a recipe for madness, or at the very least it results in a tremendous amount of wasted effort.

On the other hand, we must believe we can control a change in order to place ourselves in the most powerful of places... Type I.d. All who have achieved great things believed from the start that it was in their power to change something, even when - especially when - everyone around them said they were crazy and would not succeed.

The challenge is to determine whether we are falling into the abyss of Type I.c change or standing at the brink of Type I.d greatness.

The only way to ensure we are making the right decision is to:

a) Know ourselves as objectively as possible - our strengths and weaknesses.

b) Know and understand, as intimately as possible, the Change that is taking place.

When attempting to implement a Type I Change, as management we have two complimentary strategies at our disposal:

a) Communicate the change as clearly as possible so that employees and coworkers are correct in their beliefs regarding how much control they have over the process. You don't want your team in the Type I.c box if they could move up to I.a or across to I.d.

b) Wherever possible, and it's nearly always possible, give some control of the change to those who must respond to it. The more we can let staff operate in the Type I.d. space, the more they are empowered.

© 2004, Peter de Jager – Peter is a Change Management seminar leader, speaker and consultant. Contact him at pdejager@technobility.com or visit him at www.technobility.com


Do you have a comment or feedback on this article? Email us and let us know what you think.