Galt Global Review

QFS 360

 

December 20, 2006

A Laugh a day

by Faye Mallett
 
 

“A day without laughter is the most wasted of all days,” wrote poet E.E Cummings. “Laughter is an instant vacation,” comedian Milton Berle is quoted as saying. And Mel Brooks, the well-known comedy producer, puts it this way: “Humour is just another defense against the universe.”

Comments and reflections about laughter have existed in our culture since the time of the early Greeks. Likewise, so has the attempt to control laughter. Plato warns against the use of it in his Republic, asserting that it “weakens character and confuses the mind.” In the royal courts of medieval Europe, court jesters were the only ones allowed to poke fun (and ultimately criticize) the monarchy without being beheaded; and comedians are a targeted group in totalitarian regimes, often forced to use humour only in service to the state (Hitler , for example, held “Joke Courts” as a means to control the use of humour directed against the Third Reich).

William Sargent, a psychologist who has done intensive studies on the process of brainwashing, discovered in his research that if the subjects laugh at any point in the process, the “whole process is wrecked and must be begun all over again.” As Sargent’s brainwashing experiments reveal, a strong connection exists between laughter and freedom of thought; for laughter can disempower any given situation that causes stress in our lives. If we can laugh at it, it can’t kill us (or control us). Moreover, it is also a much sought-after and satisfying state of human expression. Yet as we get older, many of us lose the capacity to laugh very much. Psychologists tell us that children laugh 400 times each day whereas adults only laugh 7 to 15 times. That is a difference of 385 laughs! While we may never get back to that state of being as carefree as a child, injecting some much needed laughter into our lives is good not only for our bodies, but for our brains as well - as science is fast proving. With science deciding to get involved in the debate, scores of dedicated researchers have set out out to find out why we laugh in the first place, and how we benefit from it. Even a new field of scientific study has been created around this subject. Gelotology: the study of human laughter.

Journalist and former Saturday Review editor Norman Cousins is credited with first popularizing the notion that laughter has healing benefits. In his book, Anatomy of an Illness, Cousins recounts the years he survived ankylosing spondylitis, a painful degenerative disease of the connective tissue. With the support of his doctor, Cousins put himself on a “prescriptive” program of watching funny movies and getting comedic books read out loud to him. As Cousins describes it: “It worked. I made the joyous discovery that ten minutes of genuine belly laughter had an anesthetic effect and would give me at least two hours of pain-free sleep.”

Ten years after Cousins published his account, two researchers from Loma Linda University began to look more seriously into the scientific benefits of laughter. Lee Berk, M.D., associate director of the Center for Neuroimmunology, and Stanley Tan, M.D., assistant professor of medicine, found that laughter changes the levels of epinephrine and cortisol – the so-called “stress hormones” – as well as other natural “killer cells” in our body that are responsible for the early recognition and removal of viruses and tumours. As reported by Bill Strubbe, who recounted these studies in Body Sense Magazine, Berk and Tan conducted experiments that showed that “laughter increases levels of gamma-interferon (a disease-fighting protein); T-cells, which are a major part of the immune response; and B-cells, which make disease-destroying antibodies.” Continued medical research in this field has also shown that even if we only pretend to laugh or act happy, our bodies begin to produce the same chemicals that are released when we genuinely do feel happiness or are laughing.

We can all expect to experience stress in our lives, which gives the study of laughter much more serious implications than one may first think. Exposure to constant, or acute, stress, suppresses the immune functions of the body, leaving organisms much more vulnerable to disease and infection. While the more popular (and much more endorsed solution) of our society is to either drug or numb our stress with “painkillers” and prescription drugs, gelotology researchers are discovering that there is a much more cheaper, and natural, option out there. The thing is: Can anybody take laughter so seriously?

New brain research, collaborating with the medical and scientific evidence that laughter is good for our immune systems, suggests that the urge to laugh is a response to our need for social connection. As Mariana Funes, a British cognitive psychologist with extensive experience in the study of laughter, writes: “I take my laughter very seriously. Long before I knew about the health-giving effects of laughter I used to make it my aim in my daily interactions with people to share a smile, a chuckle or a laugh with them before moving on to the busy demands of my day. I judge the success of my interactions with others by the extent with which I am able to share laughter with them.”

Funes describes herself as becoming a rather “reluctant laughter educator.” As a corporate consultant, Funes conducts workshops on laughter for management and personal development. In her book, Laughing Matters, she talks about how, in her work with large corporations, a group of people may be working and achieving results while at the same time sharing a lot of laughter and play. There always comes a moment, Funes observes, when someone in the group will say: “That’s enough. Let’s get back to work!” It is precisely such prejudices like this one, Funes argues, that stop the flow of integrated thinking, when our two modes of thinking, G-Mode and D-Mode, are both being activated at the same time.

D-Mode (deliberate thinking) is “cognitive consciousness.” Purposeful and articulate, it is the method we often employ to evaluate ideas. G-Mode thinking, on the other hand, stands for gap-mode thinking, and is often “dismissed” as intuition. In G-mode thinking we employ our originality to “mess around” with the problem and generate ideas. While culturally, we are more encouraged to develop our D-Mode thinking skills, both are essential for the process of learning. Where does laughter fit into this? Laughter falls within the realm of G-mode thinking: intuitive, unconscious, it is often a signal that we have made a new connection, and have suddenly perceived something in a new way.

Part II of this article will be an in-depth interview with Dr. Mariana Funes on our her latest area of research: Reframing leadership competencies through laughter and using time sustainably.


 

 

Do you have a comment or feedback on this article? Email us and let us know what you think.

 Business News / Business Roundup - Australia / Canada / Europe / United States / Careers / Classified / Information Technology / New Technology / Education News / World Facts / Book Reviews / Archives/Research