Galt Global Review

QFS 360

 
September 4, 2007

the science of intention


by Faye Mallett


“In the latter years of his boxing career, [Muhammad] Ali spent much of his training time learning how to take punches. He studied how to shift his head by just a hair a microsecond before the connection was made, or where in his body he could mentally deflect the punch so that it would no longer hurt. He was not training his body to win. He was training his mind not to lose, at the point when deep fatigue sets in around the 12th round and most boxers cave in. Ali’s most important work was being done, not in the ring, but in his armchair. He was fighting the fight in his head. Excerpt from The Intention Experiment: Using Your Thoughts to Change Your Life and the World, by Lynne McTaggart.

Targeting your thoughts -- or what scientists continually refer to as "intention" and "intentionality" – has by now become a familiar topic in mainstream culture and media. Browse any self-help section of your bookstore and you’ll easily find a number of titles with the words “intention” or “mind power” in them. Some of these books, however, (albeit most of them) are based more on pop psychology and faddish philosophies than on honest scientific evidence and results; placing the topic within the dubious realm of being “new age.”
Yet the techniques involved in mental rehearsal, visualization, and intention have been studied and written about in scientific literature and popular publications for years. In 1990, for example, the National Academy of Sciences examined all the scientific studies to date on these methods and declared them effective.

One recently-published book on the subject is The Intention Experiment, written by science writer and award-winning journalist Lynne McTaggart. By posing the question: Can our thoughts influence the world around us?; McTaggart makes a comprehensive investigation of the subject in her study of athletes; analysis of the leading evidence in neuroscience; psychology; and the latest findings in physics.

Along with publishing The Intention Experiment, McTaggart also teamed up with top scientists of our time, including physicist Fritz-Albert Popp of the International Institute of Biophysics and Dr. Gary Schwartz, professor of psychology, medicine, and neurology at the University of Arizona, to create a global “mind-over-matter” experiment. Through to the end of this year, tens of thousands of volunteers from around the world are currently participating in a series experiments on mind intention and science, making it the largest study of its kind in history.

The art of intention
Intention in its highest form is often attributed to performance in sports. At any level, athletes are regularly coached into mental “rehearsals or “practices” as a means to improve their performance. Indeed, mental training is often considered the element that separates the elite athlete from the amateur. Soccer players on national teams, for example, are more likely to use imagery than those at the provincial or local levels; and virtually all Olympic athletes use mental imagery of some sort to achieve their near super-human feats.

But when it comes to seeing the extent to how much intention has marked the success of an individual’s achievements, Muhammad Ali is a prime example.

“Ali was a master of intention,” states McTaggart. “He developed a set of mental skills, which heightened his performance in the ring. Before a fight, Ali used every self-motivational technique: affirmation; visualization; mental rehearsal; self-confirmation; and perhaps the most powerful epigram of personal worth ever uttered: I am the greatest.

The latest evidence in neuroscience concurs. An important instrument in brain research, the electroencephalogram (EEG), has shown that the electrical activity produced by the brain is the same whether thinking about doing something or actually doing it. Based on this research, one school of thought in the scientific community proposes that by mentally rehearsing through an event creates the neural patterns necessary for the real thing.

The “Dual-code” theory, first advanced by Allan Paivio of the University of Western Ontario, is another neuroscience theory which posits that the brain processes verbal and non-verbal information at the same time, but along distinct channels. This means that information sent to the brain – both imagined and real - is then organized as knowledge that can be “acted upon, stored, and retrieved for subsequent use.” (source: wikipedia)

Mental practise has therefore been shown to be just as effective as physical practice, and Paivio’s model is often employed to help athletes with their mental training.

According to scientific evidence, the most successful use of intention is the “mental trial run.” One example of this is when athletes break down each part of their performance into a number of different components and work on improving specific aspects within each component. The intention behind this technique is to concentrate on the most difficult moments of one’s performance, working out effective coping strategies in the face of adversity.

As McTaggart writes, “Like Muhammad Ali, star athletes learn how to block out images representing doubt. If an image of difficulty or loss pops into their heads, they become extremely adept at changing the internal movie, quickly editing the scene to imagine success. They engage all their senses in their mental rehearsal. They hear it, feel it, smell it and taste it… The most important intention of all is to rehearse the victory, which appears to help secure it.”

How can simply thinking about a future performance actually affect the outcome of the event?
Electromyography (EMG) has benefited science by showing how our brains send instruction to our bodies through electrical impulse sent to specific muscles. So far, as scientists have learned, neurotransmitters that signal to the muscles along a particular pathway are stimulated by either an action or a thought, and the chemicals that have been produced remain there for a short period.

We therefore tend to become better at certain tasks because the electric signaling for it has been forged. “It’s not unlike a train track laid down through wild country,” states McTaggart. “Future performances improve because your brain already knows the route by following the track.”